This article will answer many of yours child custody mediation questions.
Legal concepts such as “legal custody”, “physical custody” and “visitation rights” embody very different concepts and parents need to clearly understand them in order to make good decisions in their divorce.
Please contact us for a no-obligation consultation.
Click on the “+” symbol to see the answers to these common questions.
“Legal custody” is the term used (at least in California) to describe the legal power of divorced parents to make certain essential decisions concerning their minor children. I believe that married couples inherently both share this legal decision-making power over their minor children unless the Court has suspended the parent’s legal rights. However, when a marriage ends, the parents’ inherent power over their minor children must be made formal as part of their divorce decree.
After a divorce, legal custody over minor children is either held jointly by both parents (joint legal custody) or is held by only one parent (sole legal custody). Some of the fundamental subject areas where parents exercise this legal power over their minor children are:
a) medical (choice of doctors, choice of treatment, matters related to elective surgery/medical procedures like orthodontics),
b) counseling (entering the children into psychotherapy and/or family counseling),
c) theological (religious training and upbringing), and
d) educational (private school, religious school, home schooling or public school).
Hopefully, many of these significant child-rearing topics were discussed and agreed upon before marriage or before the children were born. However that does not mean that they never come up again either in a divorce or after separation. In fact, in some cases the conflict on these topics may contribute to the divorce in the first place.
Moreover, I can say that many other decisions concerning children are rarely discussed or firmly resolved between the couple prior to, or during, marriage. Many of these issues are simply abstractions for newlyweds that only need to be resolved when their children come of age or as circumstances require. I am sure that most newlywed couples believe that together they can face any problem which arises during their marriage.
However, the mere existence of the divorce can bring some concerns about child rearing to the forefront and once they surface they need to be resolved as part of their divorce mediation. Some examples which come immediately to mind are:
a) the wisdom in allowing the children to play certain after school sports,
b) incurring the cost to allow the children to engage in certain after school enrichment activities,
c) the determination as to what age the children are going to be allowed their own cell phone and/or video console,
d) the issues relating to the children obtaining a driver’s license or having their own car, (and who is going to pay for the child’s car insurance)
e) the suitability of the minor child getting a job and at what age
f) the age to permit dating,
g) subjects relating to body piercings and/or tattoos, and
h) concerns about children wearing makeup or coloring their hair.
Not every set of divorcing parents resolves all of these issues in mediation but some subset of these or similar questions frequently arise.
Typically the paramount concerns for divorcing couples with minor children are the visitation and custody plans for the children and the accompanying child support payments. There is no doubt these are important topics; however, underpinning every aspect of a divorce involving minor children is the question of who gets legal custody.
To say that parenting issues and legal custody of children are thorny problems is an understatement. This is especially true for a couple who has found out after marriage and after having children that they also have “irreconcilable differences”.
The vast majority of divorcing couples resolve the whole question of legal custody in divorce mediation in one of two ways. Most kick the legal can of worms down the road and agree to joint legal custody under the wishful assumption that they can resolve their specific co-parenting problems (which will inevitably arise) by avoiding them for as long as possible. This often results in them facing their co-parenting problems in real time under the stress of having to make an immediate decision to avoid a disastrous flare up.
The alternative is the couple will agree on joint legal custody and then negotiate hard during their divorce mediation for clarity on those essential matters upon which they each have strong values and feelings. Then they incorporate their agreement into the Marital Settlement Agreement. This may make their divorce process more difficult, but it makes long-range co-parenting more likely to be successful. The honesty and clarity which a professional facilitator can engender in these cases is frequently surprising to the couple with a practice of arguing and fighting (which led to a breakdown in their marriage due to irreconcilable differences).
That being said, very few parents willingly give up their lawful parental rights and relinquish legal custody of their children and so sole legal custody is rare. Once the ramifications between joint legal custody and sole custody are understood and discussed, in my experience as a mediator, couples almost always agree to joint legal custody.
The most impactful issue with respect to sole vs. joint legal custody is having the legal power to allow the child to be legally adopted. A parent with sole legal custody can allow their child to be adopted without the consent of the other parent. This can deprive the non-custodial parent of any say in how their child is raised.
If the non-custodial parent has joint legal custody then their consent is required for the adoption.
This issue typically comes up in a divorce context when one parent remarries and the newly married step-parent wants full legal authority over their step-child.
I do not see the adoption topic come up in initial divorce mediations, but it does come up in follow-up mediations. There are ramifications regarding the non-custodial parent’s obligations for child support that can come into play and so a mediated agreement is often preferable than going to Court.
Generally, no matter how legal custody is formally held, in an actual medical emergency, there are special rules allowing either parent to make decisions for their minor children under their care.
There are many routine parental decisions which do not require formal legal authority. They are generally shared by both parents, exercised whenever the children are under their care and supervision. Some examples might be whether to give children whole milk, skim milk or almond milk with their breakfast, (assuming no allergy or other medical issues), what type bike to get the children…a 5 speed or 10 speed bike, or whether to have the children attend to their homework before or after dinner and so on.
Kids and their parents understand there may be different rules in mom’s house compared to dad’s house. However, if one parent has sole legal custody there may be a limit to the latitude they are willing to extend to their co-parent. If one parent chronically allows the children to stay up later when at their house, or allows the children junk food and soft drinks when the other parent is more health conscious, or allows them to watch movies the other parent does not approve of, then trouble lies ahead.
The other major decision which must be made by divorcing couples with minor children is where their children will live and how much time they will spend with their non-custodial parent. The term “primary physical custody” refers to the household where the children spend the majority of their time. “Visitation” refers to the time spent under the noncustodial parent’s care.
First of all, the Court always has the power to modify visitation for minor children. However, if the parents have agreed privately on a visitation schedule, it is rare for the Court to overrule their decision.
There are a number of benefits from using private mediation. For one thing, it is easier to schedule. The Court process is cumbersome and is scheduled at the convenience of the Court and the Court staff. On the other hand, private mediation is scheduled at the convenience of the parents.
Private mediation results in agreements to which the parties are much more likely to adhere. This has been shown in study after study. I think that when the parents get to talk and work things out, they tend to keep their arrangement; Child custody and visitation in mediation, however, when a Judge rules in the matter then one party or the other tends to be feeling victimized or annoyed at the decision and they sometimes only reluctantly comply. There is less goodwill between the parties when they have someone else rule for them. Comparatively, when the parents go through the typical give and take of negotiating a visitation schedule they often see the common ground with their co-parent as they sort out what they want, what they think is best for the kids and what their co-parent desires.
Another benefit is that the parents may bring up more delicate issues in private mediation because it is confidential. Nuances about subjects like the grandparents, new relationships, and the actual developmental needs of the children can be discussed more freely in private mediation because it is a confidential process whereas the Court process is not confidential.
Finally, another benefit which frequently occurs in private mediation is that couples learn firsthand that they can work together and solve problems for the benefit of their children. This is invaluable because many couples argue in circles and rarely resolve matters without massive power struggles and mediation can show them another way of communicating.
Yes, generally the parents can create any visitation schedule they choose so long as the needs of the children are not neglected. Visitation can be:
a) overnight (from just after school until the beginning of school the next morning) or
b) over the weekend (Friday night after work until Monday before school), or
c) it can be for several days in a row (one week on and one week off).
Visitation can also be for a specified short duration like a few hours for dinner every other Wednesday evening. Parents with rotating work schedules can negotiate flexible visitation schedules to allow for their time off. Some parents have occasional work travel requirements and so long as both parents cooperate, they can negotiate a visitation schedule which accommodates their travel.
In an ordinary custody and visitation order issued by the Court there are not travel restrictions unless there has been a specific motion and hearing on that subject. In private mediation, some couples will negotiate specific limitations on travel. This concern typically arises in one of several common cases:
a) when as a couple they have traveled frequently and have younger children,
b) when they have relatives that live out of state which one party might want to visit for an extended trip (summer vacation) or
c) when one party was born, or has family, outside the USA.
If there is a mediated visitation agreement then the Court will almost inevitably accept the limits as negotiated by the parents and incorporate that into a custody order.